IIMS Journal of Management Science

Personality as Predictor of Employee Engagement: An Empirical Study

Neetu Jain*¹

First Published 1 Jun 2022. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0976-173X.4.2.017

Article Information

Volume 4, Issue 2 July-December, 2013

¹Dr. Neetu Jain is working as Assistant Professor (OB/HRM) with FORE School of Management. She has more than fourteen years of experience. She has presented several papers in National and International Conferences and has contributed research papers to well-known journals and periodicals. She can be contacted at neetujain1@yahoo.com; neetu_jain@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Employee engagement has been labelled as one of the “hottest topics in management” in recent times. Moreover with an incessantly deepening “engagement gap” reported amongst employees (Kowalski, 2003), that is threatening to cripple organisational growth and productivity, it becomes imperative to advance research on the construct thus leading to a better appreciation and application of the same in the interest of the organisation. Therefore, it becomes crucial to understand whether personality acts as a predictor of employee engagement or not. Therefore, this research paper seeks to explore the relationship between personality (Five factor model [FFM]) and employee engagement of Employees of Corporation. The data for the present study is collected from 100 working executives employed in a trading corporation in New Delhi. To measure Big Five Personality Traits, the short form of the WorkPlace Big Five ProFile (WPB5) which is an abridged version of a 107-question FFM personality assessment especially designed for the workplace was used. The Employee Engagement survey is based on Kahn’s model of employee engagement derived from Gallup Q12 instrument. Statistical analysis tools such as regression analysis, correlation analysis, t-test and ANOVA are being used for the purpose of analysis of data. The study indicates that there is a significant relationship between employee engagement and conscientiousness. It has also been found that the other four factors of personality namely – openness to experience, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism do not have any significant relationship with employee engagement. There is no significant difference in employee engagement scores of males and females and also across the three levels of management namely higher, middle and lower levels of management. Employee engagement scores of the employees in the general cadre and those in the finance cadre are same. There is no significant correlation between the number of years of service and employee engagement scores. The relationship of the FFM of Personality to employee engagement is much less studied, especially in Asian countries. And, moreover, no study of such nature was done on a sample set comprising Indians.

Keywords

Employee engagement, Personality, Five factor model, Conscientiousness, Talent retention, Personality traits

JEL Classification: O-15

References

Barrick, M .R. Mount, M .K. and Judge, T.A. (2001). Personality and performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?, Blackwell Publishers. Ltd, 9 (1/ 2 March / June).

Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L. and Piotrowski, M. (2000, April). Personality and sales performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation. Paper presented at the fifteenth annual meeting of the Society for Industrial– Organizational Psychology, Inc., New Orleans, LA.

Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L. and Piotrowski, M. (2000). ‘Personality and sales performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation’, Paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial- Organizational Psychology, Inc., New Orleans, LA.

Gorman, B. Jr. and Gorman, R. E. (2006). ‘Why managers are crucial to increasing engagement’, Strategic HR Review, Vol 5(2), pp. 24-27.

Bennett, M. and Bell, A. (2004). ‘Leadership and Talent in Asia’, John Wiley and Sons, Hewitt, Singapore.

Bernthal, P. (2004). ‘Measuring employee engagement’, In: Macey, H.M., and Schnei-der, B, editors. (2008). ‘The Meaning of Employee Engagement’, Vol. 1, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 3-30.

Bindl, U. K. and Parker, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward thinking and change oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and organizational Psychology, Vol.2, pp. 567-598, Washington D.C: APA.

Buckingham, M. and Coffman, C. (1999). ‘First, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently’, Simon and Schuster, New York.

Cartwright, S. and Holmes, N. (2006). ‘The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism’, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 16(2), pp. 199-208.

Colbert, B. A. (2004). The Complex Resource based View: Implications for Theory and Practice in Strategic Human Resource Management, Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 341-58.

Costa, P.T. Jr. and McCrae, R.R. (1992). ‘NEO PIR: Professional Manual’, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.

Fredrickson, B. L. (March 2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology, American psychologist, pp. 218-226

Glen, C. (2006). ‘Key skills retention and motivation: The war for talent still rages and retention is the high ground’, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 38(1), pp. 37-45.

Goffin, R. D., Rothstein, M. G. and Johnson, N. G. (1996). ‘Personality testing and the assessment centre: Incremental validity for managerial selection’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81. pp. 746-756.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). ‘An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, pp. 1216-1229.

Guion, R. M. and Gottier, R. E. (1965). ‘Validity of personality measures in personnel selection’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 18, pp. 135-164.

Hogan, J., Najar, M. and Holland, B. (1999). ‘Validity of the Hogan Personality Inventory of Selecting Managers in Construction Supply Industry (Tech. Rep. No. 158)’, Hogan Assessment Systems, Tulsa, OK.

Hogan, J., Najar, M. and Holland, B. (1999). Validity of the Hogan Personality Inventory of selecting managers in construction supply industry (Tech. Rep. No. 158). Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.

Hough, L. M. and Ones, D. S. (2001). ‘The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology’, In: Anderson, N.R., Ones D.S., Sinangil H. and Viswesvaran C, editors, ‘Handbook of Work Psychology’, Sage, New York, pp. 233-377.

Howard, P. J. and Howard, J. M. (2001). ‘The Owner’s Manual for Personality at Work’, Bard Press, Texas.

Johnson, J. A. and Ostendorf, E. (1993). ‘Clarification of the five-factor model with the abridged big five dimensional circumplex’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 563-576.

Joo, Baek-Kyoo (Brian) and Mclean, G.N. (2006). ‘Best employer studies: A conceptual model from a literature review and a case study’, Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 5(2), pp. 228-257.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). ‘An exercise of authority’, Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, Vol. 14(2), pp. 28-42.

Kowalski, B. (2003). ‘The engagement gap’, Training, Vol. 40(4), pp. 62.

Lamp M. D. and Earl, J. (2006). You’ve Gotten Employee Feedback. Now What? Workplace Surveys Are Meaningless. Even Demoralizing. Unless Companies Act on the Results, Gallup Management Journal. Available at: http:// businessjournal.gallup.com/content/22753/youve-gotten-employee-feedback-now-what.aspx Last accessed on 28 May (2012).

Locke, E. A. and Hulin, C. L. (1962). ‘A review and evaluation of the validity studies of activity vector analysis’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 25-42.

Macey, W. H. and Schneider, B. (2008). ‘The meaning of employee engagement’, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1. pp. 3.30.

McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). ‘Personality trait structure as human universal’, American Psychologist, Vol. 52, pp. 509-16.

Meyer, J. P. and Gagne, M. (2008). ‘Employee engagement from a self-determination theory perspective’, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 60.62.

Parsley, A. (2006). ‘Road map for employee enga-gement’, Management Services, Vol. 50(1), pp. 10-11.

Robinson, D., Perryman, S. and Hayday, S. (2004). ‘The Drivers of Employee Engagement’, Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.

Robinson, D., Perryman, S. and Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement, Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.

Rothbard, N.P. (2001). ‘Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, pp. 655-684.

Saks, A.M. (2006). ‘Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21(7), pp. 600-619.

Salgado, J.F. (1997). ‘The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82(1), pp. 30-43.

Saucier, G. and Goldberg, L.R. (1998). ‘What is beyond the big five?’, Journal of Personality, Vol. 66, pp. 495-524.

Saucier, G., and Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495–524.

Schaufeli, W.B. and Bakker, A.B. (2004). ‘Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25, pp. 293.315.

Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Smith, D. B. and Salvaggio, A. N. (2003). .Which Comes First: Employee Attitudes or Organizational Financial and Market Performance?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5):836- 51. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) (2009). APA.

Smithikrai, C. (2007). ‘Personality traits and job success: An investigation in a Thai sample’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 15, pp. 134-138.

Sonnentag, S. (2003). ‘Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behaviour: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88(3);518-528.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18(7), pp. 509-553.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management., Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-53.

Tett, R.P., Jackson, D.N. and Rothstein, M. (1991). ‘Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A metaanalytic review’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 44, pp. 703-742.

Tupes, E. C. and Christal, R. C. (1961). ‘Recurrent Personality Factors Based on Trait Ratings (USAF WADC Tech. Note No. 61-97)’, United States Air Force, Lacklund Air Force Base, TX.

Welbourne, T. (2007). ‘Engagement: Beyond the fad and into the executive suite’, Leader to Leader, Vol. 44, pp. 45-51.

Wildermuth, C. M. S. (2010). The personal side of engagement : The influence of Personality factors in handbook of employee engagement edited by Simon L. Albrecht, Edward Elgar publishing Ltd, U.K

Woodruffe, C. (2006). ‘Employee engagement’, British Journal of Administrative Management, (Dec2005/Jan 2006). Vol. 50, pp. 28-29.

Wright, T. A., Cropanzano, R., Bonett, D. G. (2007). The moderating role of employee positive well being on the relation between job satisfaction and job performance, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 12(2), Apr 2007, 93-104.