IIMS Journal of Management Science
issue front

Kalpana Tyagi

Article Information Volume 10, Issue 1 and 2 January-August, 2019

Kalpana Tyagi is currently working as Legal Informatics, Department of Law, Aarhus University School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus, Denmark. She can be reached at kt@law.au.dk/ kalpana.tyagi@emle.eu

Abstract

Transition from 2G to 3G to 4G and now the promised 5G is discontinuous. Amongst all, the transition to 5G is expected to be the ‘most discontinuous’. With connected devices talking to each other in connected smart cities and factories and the blockchain technology maintaining a ‘ledger of all the transactions’, following three key challenges emerge – first, interoperability amongst devices for smooth functioning of the 5G ecosystem; second, preserving the integrity of the infrastructure to prevent any potential manipulation of the networks and third, setting standards for the competitive advantage of an economy. The Make in India and Digital India can be a reality only if the three identified challenges are addressed through systematic policy efforts and public-private partnerships. Using an inter-disciplinary methodology using insights from business strategy and comparative approach by assessing the policies of different countries such as the US, the EU and China, this article - part of series of articles dealing with standard setting in the era of 5G - first, elaborates on the relevance of standard setting in the era of 5G, followed by a discussion on India’s preparedness for the same.

Keywords

Standard setting, Innovation, 5G, World trade organization, International telecommunications union, Sustainable development, Make in India, Digital India

JEL Classification: 3-D, 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G

References

Bauer, Johannes M: The Internet and Income Inequality: Socio-Economic Challenges in a Hyper connected Society. Telecommunications Policy, doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.009

Bekkers, R., G.S.R. (2013): Background Paper: The Role of Standards in a Digital Economy. International Telecommunications Union (Paper).

Bekkers, R.N.A. and Verspagen, B. and Smits, J. (2003): Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM.

Bhardwaj, R. (2015) ‘Standard Setting in India: Competition and Intellectual Property Issues’, Indian Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 18-28.

Choi, Y.S. and Youn, S.Y. (2013): The Enforcement of Merger Control in China: A Critical Analysis of Current Decisions by MOFCOM. Thesis. 44 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law.

Dolmans, M. (2002) ‘Standards for Standards’, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, p. 6.

Drexl, J. (2015): Standard Setting Organizations and Processes: Challenges for Competition and Innovation – Introduction, Conference: New Frontiers of Antitrust No. 3 Concurrences.

Economic Times, Marketing: Definition of Pest Analysis <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/pest-analysis> (accessed 13 June 2018).

Goix, L.W. and Sullivan, B. (2015): Opportunities and Challenges for Standardization in Mobile Social Networks, Joint paper by Telecom Italia and AT&T for GSMA and Open Mobile Alliance. Google/Motorola Mobility (Case COMP/M. 6381) [2012] OJ C075/01. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/ m6381_20120213_20310_2277480_EN.pdf Government of India Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Discussion paper on standard essential patents and their availability on FRAND terms (2016),<http://www.ipindia.nic.in/Whats_New/standardEssentialPaper_01 March 2016.pdf>(accessed on 12 July 2019).

Gupta, A. (2013) ‘Environment & PEST Analysis: An Approach to External Business Environment’, International Journal of Modern Social Sciences. Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 25-39.

Gupta, S., Tyagi, K. and Upadhaya, R. (2018) ‘Twilight of Voice, Dawn of Data: The Future of Telecommunications in India’, Special Edition on Telecoms Decision, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 161-183.

International Telecommunications Union, Understanding Patents, Competition and Standardization in an Interconnected World (2014): https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/Documents/Manual_Patents_Final_E.pdf

Kannan, S. (2019): Bangalore: India’s IT hub readies for the Digital Future, BBC News, Bangalore.<https:// www.bbc.com/news/technology-23931499> (accessed 12 July 2019).

Lakshané, R. (2015): Conference on Standards Setting Organizations (SSO) and FRAND (National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. <https://cis-india.org/a2k/blogs/conference-on-standards-settings-organizations-sso-and-frand-nlsiu> (accessed 12 July 2019).

Lamping, M., et al. (2014): Declaration on Patent Protection Regulatory Sovereignty under TRIPS, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper No. 14-19.

Magistad, M.K. (2018): India’s ‘Silicon Valley’, Banaglore is fast becoming a serious global player https://www/pri.org/stories/2016-05-06/indias-silicon-valley-bangalore-fast-becoming-serious-global-player (accessed 11 June 2018).

Ministry of Commerce-Announcement of Approval with Additional Restrictive Conditions of the Acquisition of Motorola Mobility by Google, Announcement No. 25, 2012. (accessed on 12 July 2019). Mohan, V., Can India be the Next Silicon Valley? Inc 42 (Online 4 May 2018): (accessed 12 July 2019). National Research Council, Patent Challenges for Standard-Setting in the Global Economy: Lessons from Information and Communication Technology, Washington, DC: The National Academic Press accessed 10 June 2018. Olsson, S. (2014): Turning Demographic Ageing in Europe into Opportunities, Health Access: ICT for Health, Sweden (Report). Oughton, E.J. and Frias, Z: The cost, coverage and rollout implications of 5G infrastructure in Britain. Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 636-652 Parsheera, S., Shah, A. and Bose, A. (2017): Competition Issues in India’s Online Economy, NIPFP Working Paper Series No. 194. Porter Michael, E: The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review (March-April 1990), (accessed on 12 July 2019). Pai, Y. (2017) ‘Standard-Essential Patents: A Prolegomena in New Global Patent Issues: SEPs War of the 21st Century’, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 59-66. Prahalad, C.K. (2005): The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits, New Delhi: Pearson Education/Wharton School Publishing. Raghavan Committee report: Indian Competition Law (2000): Report of the High Level Committee on Competition Policy and Law, (accessed 12 July 2019). Raje AP, Silicon Valley of the East? Pune is becoming an innovation hub, Financial Times (Online 19 April 2013) (accessed 12 July 2019). Ramakrishna T, Murthy SK and Malhotra S (2012). Intellectual Property and ICT Standards in India, Commissioned by the US National Academies of Science, Board of Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP), Project on Intellectual Property Management in Standard Setting Processes dt. 17 September 2012. Rastogi V, Delhi NCR – An Emerging IT Hub in India, India Briefing (Online 29 March 2017) (accessed 12 July 2019). Schumpeter, J. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (first published 1927, Harper & Row. New York. Schnellingerhout, R. (2011) ‘Standard-setting from a competition law perspective’, Competition Policy Newsletter No.1, pp. 1-9. Shapiro, C. (2000) ‘Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, presented as the Innovation Policy and the Economy’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 119- 150. Statement of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division on Its Decision to Close Its Investigations of Google Inc.’s Acquisition of Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. and the Acquisitions of Certain Patents by Apple Inc., icrosoft Corp. a…, (Feb. 2012, available at (accessed on 12 July 2019). Teece, D.J., Sherry, E.F. and Grindley, P.C. (2017): On the “non-discrimination” aspect of FRAND Licensing: A response to the Indian Competition Commission’s recent orders. IIM Bangalore Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 10-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2017.09.002. Tsilikas, H. (2017) ‘Huawei v. ZTE in Context – EU Competition Policy and Collaborative Standardization in Wireless Telecommunications’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 48, No. 2, p. 51. Walch, A. (2017) ‘The Path of Blockchain Lexicon (and the Law)’, Review of Banking & Financial Law, Vol. 36, No. 1, p. 713. West, D.M. and Allen, J.R. (2018): How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the World, Brookings Institute Report (accessed 12 July 2019). World Economic Forum and Bain & Company, ‘Personal Data: New Asset Report’ (January 2011) (accessed on 12 July 2019)


Make a Submission Order a Print Copy